If You Support Amnesty, Then Support It
The proponents of amnesty for illegal aliens have frittered away their opportunity to convince Americans that the “Grand Compromise” was good for the country. They needed to persuade law and order supporters that the doctrine of not allowing lawbreakers to keep their ill-gotten gains should be put aside in the case of the aliens’ sojourn in this country. Instead, the supporters spent the last month employing three counter-productive uses of rhetoric intended to obfuscate, not enlighten.
Their first device was attempting to reclassify amnesty as not “amnesty”. Resorting to reading dictionary definitions to buttress their case was ludicrous. The understanding of the American people is that amnesty meant allowing illegal aliens to live and work in the
The second verbal volley they used was the passionate tirades about proponents caring about the country and opponents being un-American. Such tiresome antics showed people that the supporters were realizing that the proposal could not be argued or won on its merits. The effect of emotional outbursts was to encourage people to look even more closely at the details to see what the haranguers were trying to hide. Of course, analysis of the details would be the last thing the supporters would want to encourage people to do if they wanted to pass the bill.
The third and most deceptive remarks came in the last week before the final cloture vote. Accepting that Americans were more interested in enforcement than in giving away jobs to foreigners, the supporters went on the offensive by only talking about the enforcement provisions and dropping references to the fate of the illegal aliens within our borders. By that time it was of course too late since everyone already knew that independent analysis of the bill had revealed that the effect on illegal immigration was expected to be negligible.
I am happy that the bill as it existed at the end did not move forward, but I have some free advice to future proponents of amnesty legislation:
- Don’t deny your core belief. If you believe in amnesty, embrace it and convince others of the validity your position.
- Don’t use the played out response that the jobs held by illegal aliens are ones that Americans would not do. Explain why you believe it is okay for employers to try to maximize their profits by hiring cheaper labor.
- Admit that Mexicans and Central Americans would win while average Americans would lose, but provide convincing arguments why Americans should agree to it.
- Drop the deportation canard and explain how you believe it would be possible for aliens to remain in
- Get a clue that it is not about a path to citizenship, it is about the right to live and work here. Explain why it would be okay for illegal aliens to be at the head of the line of people wanting to enter the country.
- Don’t pretend to be more compassionate-than-thou. There is nothing uncompassionate about helping people to get home to their own country. If I was stuck in a foreign country I would be very grateful if that nation provided help to get me home.
The good news about the defeat of “comprehensive immigration reform” is now the Senate can start work at crafting comprehensive immigration reform. The white flag senators can fade into the background and let those who want to do what is right and practical for the country lead the way.
3 comments:
You have some very good points, some of which are valid, such as the fact that illegal immigrants get ahead of the ones who have to wait to enter legally. But the whole situation is about economics. If I were a poor Mexican, I'd come here too. And ask any farm owner, hotel manager, construction executive, etc., and they'll tell you that almost all Americans will not take those jobs (MSNBC had a good series on the issue). That's certainly the case here in Washington, especially the eastern part of the state.
BTW, have you read Pat Buchanan's State of Emergency? I don't agree with his overall premise (secure border, deport immigrants), but it's a very good book nontheless. He talks a lot about how corporations benefit the most from illegal immigrants. That's true, but because Americans don't want those jobs, and globalization if in full swing and there is no way to stop it, the only way for America to be successfull is to have a good education system. America can never again be an industrial (i.e., manufacturing) power, but can still be an economic powerhouse in other sectors.
I tell people two words in response to the argument that Americans won't do certain jobs: Fear Factor (the television show). I can't think of anything that more clearly demonstrates that Americans will do anything, no matter how difficult or disgusting, if the money is right.
For jobs that are inherently non-exportable (construction, hospitality, cleaning), the law of supply and demand would set wages higher to attract American workers and the cost to consumers would be corrected to reflect the actual value of the service. For jobs that are exportable, such as in agriculture, the increase in labor cost would finally force innovation on an industry that is still picking vegetables the way that our ancient ancestors did thousands of years ago. There is no reason to think that farming has reached the limit of labor saving innovations, but there has been no incentive to pursue them because of the availability of cheap labor.
I wrote George Voinovich, I guess of was one of those who intimidated him, that if he was going to vote and act like a Democrat, then I might as well vote for the real thing next time....
Post a Comment